
Presented by Specialty Sales LLC & AM Products

Happy Monday!
Whether or not you were ready for it, the NFL season is back.
Alright, now for the news.
No Right to Clean Water
USA TODAY reports that a federal appeals court has ruled that the U.S. Constitution does not promise every person clean drinking water. The decision came after four Jackson, Mississippi, residents sued the city over lead-contaminated water. State health-department testing from 2010 to 2013 found rising lead levels, and the residents said city officials didn’t do enough to stop the exposure or tell people the truth about it. The judges didn’t say the situation was acceptable, but the opinion called the loss of clean water “grievous.” It said only that the Constitution itself does not give residents a federal claim in this kind of case. Communities may still have other ways to press for action, including state law, regulators, elections, and public pressure. The practical lesson is simpler than the court opinion: when confidence in the water supply breaks down, households need clear information, credible testing, and a path to action. A legal ruling unfortunately does not make the water any safer.
Chloronitramide: Newly Named
WC&P Online reports that researchers have finally identified chloronitramide, a chlorination byproduct that had been detected but not fully classified for nearly 40 years. The compound forms when chlorine-based disinfectants react with microbes or other material in water, and the EPA reported in 2024 that it appears notably stable in drinking water. A new study co-authored by a Georgia Tech environmental engineering professor Shane Snyder established baseline data on the chemical and its toxicity. Snyder told The New York Times that, at the concentrations found in tap water, it could be the most toxic of the known disinfection byproducts. This is not an invitation to turn an early finding into a kitchen-table diagnosis, but a reminder that water quality is a moving target. The team says that sound treatment conversations still begin with the source, the test result, and the limits of what is actually known.
Wave Cyber: Now a Preferred Master Distributor (Sponsored)
Specialty Sales is now a preferred master distributor for Wave Cyber, a manufacturer of water-treatment components used in residential, commercial, and industrial systems.
What this means:
💧 Access to Wave Cyber product support through Specialty Sales
🔧 Composite pressure tanks, membrane pressure vessels, RO/NF membrane products, brine tanks, and cabinets
📦 Help checking availability and matching the right component to the application
📞 A direct Specialty Sales contact when tank, vessel, or system-component details need review before ordering

For Wave Cyber availability or product questions, call Specialty Sales at 800-323-3054 or visit https://specialty-sales.com/. We are placing container orders now for our stock, and would love to include your needs!
Investing in Water
Liquid Assets spoke with Tom Ferguson of Burnt Island Ventures, who makes the case that water has moved from an underfunded infrastructure market into a genuine technology investment category. Ferguson points to roughly $11 billion in water-sector liquidity events since the start of 2025 (versus a projected $3 billion) as a clear sign that larger buyers are finally paying for water platforms at scale. That being said, Ferguson also points to where the gaps still remain: labs can take two weeks to turn around results, limiting how quickly companies can test and adjust, while real-time monitoring and on-site testing remain open territory. He also points to opportunities in the unglamorous work, from commercial-kitchen efficiency tools to better ways to spot and solve operational problems before they become expensive. The takeaway is that the future-facing part of water is not venture capital itself: it’s faster information, better diagnostics, and service that gets ahead of the callback.
Under Sink or Whole House?
RKIN, WQA member and seller of point-of-use RO and whole-house systems, makes a sensible distinction in its guide to treatment: the system decision should follow the symptom, not the size of the sales opportunity. If the concern is drinking and cooking water, the company argues that under-sink or countertop RO might be the appropriate first move. If taste, odor, sediment, or scale shows up throughout the house, whole-home treatment deserves a closer look. The guide recommends starting with the local utility’s Consumer Confidence Report, then checking the disinfectant used, reported contaminants, mineral notes, and any violation language before turning a water question into an equipment quote. It also notes that sudden changes in taste, color, or sediment may warrant a call to the utility, since hydrant flushing, main breaks, or nearby work can change conditions between annual reports.
What else is happening:
WHYY reports Philadelphia water bills are rising about $7 a month to support affordability programs and infrastructure upgrades
AMPAC USA outlines monthly, quarterly, and annual maintenance checkpoints for commercial RO systems
Complete Water Guide explains what NSF/ANSI 42, 53, 58, and 401 certifications actually cover
Connecticut’s H2O Equipment explains how heavy rain and flooding can raise coliform-bacteria risk in private wells
Unlike the NFL, we’re year-round. See you next week.
-Kevin